Archive for the ‘The Book Beat’ Category

Closing the Gap for Good

New research shows that gender disparity in math skills is due to culture, not biology

Photo courtesy of neuronarrative.wordpress.com/

For as long as girls and boys have been attending co-ed schools, there has been a perceived gender gap in mathematical abilities that has seemingly led to a deficit in the number of women who will go on to study higher levels of math and to pursue careers in mathematically-related fields. This has always been attributed to an innate biological tendency of men to have the capacity to excel at mathematical reasoning, a tendency that was assumed to be lacking in women. However, a recent report from researchers at the University of Wisconsin-Madison proposes that the reasons for this disparity are in fact purely cultural, suggesting that it may be possible for our society to lessen or even close the gap completely.

Photo courtesy of www.lovetoknow.com

Photo courtesy of www.lovetoknow.com

Janet Mertz and Janet Hyde, two Wisconsin professors, were puzzled by the fact that a gender disparity in math skills is not present in certain countries and cultures, particularly those in which a large degree of gender equality exists. In analyzing data from various tests and studies of male and female students at various educational levels, �the Wisconsin researchers document a pattern of performance that strongly suggests that the root of gender disparity in math can be pegged to changeable sociocultural factors. Such factors either discourage or encourage girls and young women in the pursuit of the skills required to master the mathematical sciences.� In other words, society is the cause for any and all disparities in skill level, and the commonly held belief that women are less capable in mathematics is a self-fulfilling prophesy.

Much of the evidence for the argument that boys are naturally inclined to be better at math stems from past studies that show greater variability in the skill levels of males, meaning that they are more likely to exhibit extremely high or extremely low skill levels in the subject. However, Mertz and Hyde prove in their research that this is not the case in some countries, several of which can boast of girls scoring in the 99th percentile in math skills at the same rate that boys do.

In the United States, girls are now performing on par with boys at all levels of math and are just as likely to choose advanced math classes in high school. Moreover, the gap is narrowing between the number of mathematically gifted boys and girls, suggesting that we are perhaps moving closer to achieving the results of those countries with a higher measure of gender equality. The number of female doctoral-level mathematics students has climbed to 30% from 5% in 1950, most likely a result of changing perceptions of the role of women in mathematical and scientific research.

Though hopeful, these results appear dim in comparison to statistics regarding gender disparities as well as overall mathematical skill level in other countries, particularly those of East Asia. Here, girls consistently reach the gifted level just as often as boys do, and both sexes exhibit median scores that are higher than those of the top ten percent of US students. In their report, Mertz and Hyde emphasized that �the future of the U.S. economy depends upon American society doing a better job of identifying and nurturing mathematically talented youth, regardless of gender, race or ethnicity.� Leaving women out of the equation will have devastating effects on the growth and development of the United States and will severely hinder our efforts at achieving global economic competitiveness with those countries which foster mathematical abilities in all their students.

For more information on this research, check out the article Culture, Not Biology, Underpins Math Gender Gap at ScienceDaily.com.

Related: Looking For Science And Engineering Talent In All The Right PlacesEnhancing Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Education Act of 2008Senator Proposes Free College Tuition for Math and Science Majors Fun k-12 Science and Engineering Learning


Welcome to the Book Beat!

The World Is Flat We thought it would be interesting to read and discuss a book that is relevant to the subject of engineering’s role in the world. What better author to start off our book group than with one of the better known champions of globalization and technology — an author who writes of engineering’s importance in the 21st century.

Tom Friedman’s best seller, “The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century,” was #1 on the New York Times best seller list last week and has been on best sellers for 29 weeks now. Friedman’s topic is globalization. He argues that technology and hi-tech telecommunications have removed impediments to international competition. The resulting world is a connected one in which adaptable entrepreneurs will lead the way.

ASEE staff members Mike Gibbons, Sydney Lapeyrouse, Pete Frisbie, and Eric Iversen all read the book and agreed to participate in a roundtable discussion organized by Marian Tatu of some of the issues raised by Friedman. The next few posts are devoted to their observations and opinions.

If you’ve read the book or have suggestions for future book club selections, please feel free to jump in with any comments or opinions you might have.


Question #1

When Friedman says the world is flat, he means the playing field of the global market place has been leveled. Flat means connected, and in a flat world more people can collaborate and compete, share knowledge and share work. According to Friedman, in the period of “Globalization 3.0,” technology is the driver, and we’re in for quite a ride.

Do you share Friedman’s faith in technology to facilitate global connectivity? Have advances of the digital revolution and the Internet rendered national, economic, and political borders obsolete?


Question #2

Friedman traveled the globe, interviewing entrepreneurs, software designers, inventors, and engineers in India, China, Russia, Japan, and the US – all of whom were seeking ways to “plug and play,” compete and win. He points out that engineers in India and China are not going to be satisfied with competing for low-end jobs. “They’re not racing us to the bottom, they’re racing up to the top.”

Should we be worried about jobs going abroad?


Question #3

Friedman says business leaders have caught on, but our political elite don’t yet get it. While most leading US companies are responding rapidly, our government — folks in Washington — don’t understand technology and haven’t connected it to national economies. Do you think the Administration understands what’s happening?


Question #4

“Every morning in Africa, a gazelle wakes up. Every morning in Africa, a gazelle wakes up. It knows it must run faster than the fastest lion or it will be killed. Every morning a lion wakes up. It knows it must outrun the slowest gazelle or it will starve to death. It doesn’t matter whether you are a lion or a gazelle. When the sun comes up, you better start running.”

Friedman used this African proverb to convey a main theme he wants us to hear. It’s a jungle out there and the US better get going if we’re to keep the lead. So, are we running, or are resting in the sun?


Question #5

Friedman’s favorite question: Where were you when you realized the world is flat?


Search on this site:


Categories:

Links:

Tags:

appropriate technology ASEE career Civil Engineering Computer Science design Diversity Do-it-yourself economics Education Electrical Engineering energy engineering engineering education engineering projects engineers Engineers Without Boarders Environmental Engineering Envirotech fellowships funding Future green engineering How Things Work Innovation internet k-12 making a difference managing engineers materials engineering mechanical engineering NSF project management Research robots science science literacy Society technology The Economy The National Interest university webcast women workplace
  • Archives: