Archive for the ‘The Economy’ Category

“Rebuilding a Real Economy…” Forum Summary Published

“Americans feel prosperous based largely on the performance of three key economic indicators, said Ali Velshi, chief business correspondent for CNN. Are the values of their homes rising faster than inflation? Are their investments, whether for their children’s education or their own retirement, growing? And do their incomes equal or exceed increases in the cost of living?”

“Rebuilding a Real Economy: Unleashing Engineering Innovation: Summary of a Forum” has recently been published and is currently available online. This summary came from the 2009 Annual Meeting of the National Academy of Engineering, from a public forum with the same name, which highlights the main points brought about by seven leaders of the innovation system. These participants discussed why technological innovation is necessary for this nation to face the challenges of the 21st century.


University of Wisconsin Engineering Education Improvements

Joel Dresang of the Journal Sentinel explores the attempts by the University of Wisconsin to improve engineering education in Engineering Interest:

As industries and societies around the world face mind-boggling challenges involving such matters as infrastructure, medicine, information technology and energy, engineers are the workers trained to apply scientific knowledge to practical solutions, says Peercy, UW’s engineering dean.

The need for engineers is acute. They’re perennially on the most-wanted list in Manpower Inc.’s talent shortage surveys. Federal stimulus spending in such areas as energy technology and infrastructure should increase demand, Peercy said, and competition from emerging economies such as China and India is accelerating.

“We are so short on engineers in some disciplines in this country that my colleagues from industry in this country are telling me that they have to relocate offshore to get the workforce they need,” Peercy said in an interview.

The UW System Board of Regents approved an extra tuition charge of $700 a semester for engineering students to help the college offset higher costs of engineering instruction and to beef up staffing and enrollment. Peercy told the regents he’d boost undergraduate enrollment by 20% in five years. Already, in the first year, enrollment is up almost 8%, to 3,450 from 3,200.

Retooling curriculum: the college is integrating disciplines and broadening students’ exposure to other fields through team-teaching and more common coursework. It’s stressing experiential learning and entrepreneurial thinking through hands-on projects, competitions and student organizations such as Engineers Without Borders. It’s fostering more teamwork and communication.

Related: Duderstadt Urges Revolution in Engineering EducationWilliam Wulf Webcast: Engineering Education in the 21st CenturyEngineering Education at Smith CollegeIllinois and Olin Aim to Transform Engineering EducationPrinceton Engineering School Targets Societal Needs


Senator Kaufman: “Want to Rebuild the Economy? Ask an Engineer.”

Want to Rebuild the Economy? Ask an Engineer.
By U.S. Senator Edward E. Kaufman (who has a BS degree in mechanical engineering from Duke University)

America’s economy is in crisis. We can either drown under the weight of the problem, or we can surf the wave of opportunity that it brings – to put science, engineering and innovation back in their rightful place in our economy. If every cloud has a silver lining, the financial crisis may benefit America if we respond by taking steps to once again lead the world by innovating new industries, businesses and products.

As the only Senator holding an engineering degree, I remember when engineering ranked far ahead of business administration as the premier college degree for those who had ambition and the determination to succeed. After the Soviet Unions 1957 surprise launch of Sputnik 1, American leaders spurred the nation to catch up and improve our commitment to science. The Sputnik crisis led to the creation of NASA and other government research agencies, as well as an increase in U.S. government spending on scientific research and higher education. I was one of the young students who were drawn by Sputnik and our leaders call to seek an engineering degree.

More recently, an inordinately large percentage of Americas best and brightest college students opted instead to take their quant skills in math and analysis to Wall Street. During the go-go years on Wall Street, Americas engineering and innovation class declined. And it wasnt just that engineers were choosing finance over traditional engineering careers; fewer students were choosing to study engineering, period. Back in 1986, engineering and engineering technology students earned close to 10 percent of U.S. bachelors degrees. Despite attractive starting salaries, often above $50,000 a year, the percentage today is only about 5 percent. Only about 121,000 people earned degrees in engineering in 2007 and that includes bachelors, masters, and doctoral degrees.

Todays financial system meltdown gives our young people a new opportunity to take a hard look at where they want to spend their lives. And it gives Americas political and education leaders the opportunity to ensure that our educational pipeline is producing students skilled in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, about 80 percent of the new jobs created in the next 10 years will require these critical STEM skills. While America must remain a leader in finance, its clear we need a renewed dedication to leadership in engineering breakthroughs in energy, biotech, biomed and other many other technically based industries.

Here is what we should do right away:

Find more and better ways to marry public policy and engineering. Many universities have begun to do this, but we also must act on the government level. Beyond the current economic situation, our nation, and indeed the world, is facing a potential crisis in the supply and demand for clean energy and water. How these issues are resolved will define our childrens future. These problems require technical solutions, designed by scientists and engineers who also have a basic understanding of cultures, religions, and policy.

Develop programs that allow students to make a difference. Create an engineering jobs corps similar to the Peace Corps or Teach for America to help channel the young talent emerging from our engineering schools. The fields of bio-tech and bio-med, energy and environment should attract socially conscious students who want to improve the quality of life.

Prior to graduating, engineering students typically must write a final paper addressing a problem to solve. Lets publish those papers and make them available to government and to the business community, with authors rights kept secure.

Reach out to women and others who have traditionally been under-represented in engineering. The United States cannot maintain its position as a technological leader nor can we solve the problems we face without the perspectives and participation of all members of our society.

When I went to college I wanted to be an engineer, in part because 52 years ago the United States was supporting science and engineering on an unprecedented level. Americas competitive spirit helped us meet the challenges of those times. Thousands of innovations created myriad new opportunities for growth and development.

We can do this again. The financial crisis should cause a cultural shift back to the strong foundations of innovation and know-how that have always been the American way. And the federal government should again invest strongly in supporting the basic scientific, medical and engineering research that will spur the discovery and innovations to create millions of new jobs and shape a bright American future.

Related: Scientists and Engineers in Congress


WoodWorks Announces Educational Partnership with California Polytechnic University and Other Leading Colleges

Designing and Building large scale non-residential buildings with wood is not something most engineers and architects take seriously. The Great Chicago Fire can be cited as a pretty good reason why not to use this material. Only 137 year ago the city was destroyed by a major fire which grew in strength primarily because most of the buildings were made of wood. In 2002 a survey was taken of professional architects and engineers regarding the use of wood in major non-residential buildings. Most of the responses were negative and respondents noted building codes and the potential for fire as one of the main reasons the material was not used. Other reasons included, the cost effectiveness and performance of wood versus that of other materials and industry inertia. Woods’ one positive aspect, sustainability, was buried under these other concerns.

Now, Woodworks has just announced a partnership with a number of major universities to help teach future engineers and designers how to use wood as primary material in the construction of non-residential buildings. Sustainability is the main reason that Universities are focusing on the material and ignoring the previously noted drawbacks. However, wood has yet to get much more practicle, so students need to be educated on how to deal with woods potential problems (fires, termites, mold and rot) and use wood effectively.

Another sustainable material which would have an interesting application in the construction of green design is recycled plastic, or more specifically recycled plastic lumber. Currently recycled plastic lumber has been a popular material for deck construction and other small scale project but perhaps it would be suited for a bigger future in the construction industry.


India’s Engineering Education Dilemma

India is well known for its push to catch up to the United States and other countries economically. Currently it is the second fastest growing world economy (after China). However, in the process of economic growth, India has also drawn attention to its neglect to some main stay social issues, such as education. Although India has one of the largest labor forces in the world, most work in agriculture and are not highly educated. There is a huge divde in India between educated and uneducated citizens and it is now beginning to challenge Indias growth rate. Increasingly, India is forced to look else where, like China, to recruit future science and technology workers or come up with some creative ways to bring in more skilled workers from their own country. Today’s report in the Wall Steet Journal: India Faces a Homegrown Staffing Issue: Not Enough Talent

Related links: U.S. Competitiveness in Science and Technology Universities Seek to Strengthen Ties in Africa and China Science news in brief: Science grads short of goal


Technology, Globalization, and Culture Lectures

View webcasts of lectures from the Technology, Globalization, and Culture course at Iowa State University (Fall 2007). Lectures include:

Jim Duderstadt, President Emeritus and University Professor of Science and Engineering at the University of Michigan on “The Globalization of Higher Education”
Newt Gingrich, Author of Winning the Future: A 21st-Century Contract with America
“The coming revolution in science”
Michael Curtin, Professor of Media & Cultural Studies, Director of Global Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison on “Global Screen Industries”
Klaus Hoehn, Vice President, Advanced Technology and Engineering, Deere and Company
“Globalization and Technology – Challenge and Opportunity for Future Engineers”
Governor Tom Vilsack on “Globalization – Threats and Opportunities”

Related: Engineering for a Changing WorldDuderstadt Urges Revolution in Engineering EducationMarissa Mayer on Innovation at Google


Wyoming Petroleum Engineering Program Graduates First Students

Reinstated UW Petroleum Engineering Program to Graduate First Students

Just two years after the University of Wyoming reinstated an undergraduate degree program in petroleum engineering, 12 students will receive bachelor of science degrees in the discipline. Commencement is scheduled May 10.

“That (reinstating the B.S. degree) was a good decision,” says H. Gordon Harris, who heads the Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering in the College of Engineering and Applied Science. “All of the graduating students have been offered positions in the oil and gas industry.”

“We (UW students) have opportunities to learn about all phases of drilling and production,” he says, adding that he really appreciated learning from Jack Evers, a UW professor who came out of retirement to teach in the program. Brinkerhoff has accepted a position with EOG Resources in Vernal, Utah, and will start work for the company later this month.

Brian Towler, who was the department head when the degree was reinstated, says about 10 students in the petroleum engineering program are from the Southern Alberta Institute of Technology, where they earned two-year associates degrees and then came to UW to complete their four-year degrees. He says the university has had a long history recruiting Canadian students to finish their degrees at UW.

The demand is enormous’ in energy and mining
Read the rest of this entry »


Engineers Without Borders

Engineering as diplomacy

You cannot look into the eyes of a child who is dying from a disease caused by drinking dirty water — something that rarely, if ever, happens in the United States — and not feel changed. You cannot stand before her parents without thinking, “I’m an engineer. There must be something I can do.”

A year later, I returned with 10 engineering students from the University of Colorado. We devised a rudimentary pumping system, bringing water to the people of San Pablo. Today, the village’s young girls go to school and are healthier.

That trip was a transforming experience, not just for the villagers, but also for me. Intuitively, we engineers like things big — expansive bridges, colossal dams, massive tunnels. My experience taught me that small-scale engineering can have the most impact on people’s lives.

When I returned to Boulder, I began building something else: Engineers Without Borders — USA. The organization was formed out of the conviction that engineers have a leadership role to play in addressing some of the world’s most serious problems: contaminated water, poor sanitation systems, expensive or harmful energy sources.

In a world focused on bigger and newer, there is growing recognition that small-scale engineering can play a major role in helping end the cycle of poverty that persists among almost half the world’s population. Studies by the World Bank and United Nations suggest the most basic technology is critical to bringing more than 3 billion people out of poverty.

Today EWB-USA counts more than 11,000 student and professional engineers as members and works in 43 countries on 300 projects involving water, sanitation, energy and shelter. Whether it’s combining sustainable technologies with advanced construction techniques to bring affordable housing to pockets of the world, drilling drinking water wells in Kenya, constructing fog collectors in the Himalayas to harvest fresh water or installing solar panels to provide energy for a remote hospital in Rwanda, we are healing communities throughout the globe, giving people dignity and hope for better lives.

Engineers without Borders is another vivid example of the benefits engineering brings to society.

Related: Engineering a Better WorldScientists and Engineers Without BordersKick Start Appropriate TechnologyEngineering with People in Mind


Princeton Engineering School Targets Societal Needs

Engineering school’s growth targets societal needs

The primary role of engineering as a discipline is to use scientific knowledge to do useful things for society. So in academia, engineering serves as a bridge between the natural sciences on one hand and the humanities and the social sciences on the other. Engineers are, of course, involved very closely with natural scientists in seeking new scientific knowledge. But, engineers also work closely with humanists and social scientists in examining the implications of technology. At a liberal arts university, engineering plays a central role not only in research but also in teaching. It is our responsibility as engineering educators to make sure that all of our students, whether they are majoring in engineering or not, are technologically literate.

The School of Engineering already has significant research programs related to human health, from the development of nanoparticles for drug delivery to innovative approaches for treating diabetes. But we have even bolder ambitions. As President Shirley Tilghman has often noted, biology is experiencing a revolutionary shift, one that calls for multidisciplinary collaboration. At the vanguard of this shift are unrivaled researchers at Princeton in the Department of Molecular Biology, the Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics and the Princeton Neuroscience Institute. While we have substantial collaborations now with our colleagues in these life sciences, by deepening, expanding and leveraging these collaborations the School of Engineering can become a world-class center for biological engineering.


Engineering for a Changing World

James J. Duderstadt, President Emeritus and University Professor of Science and Engineering, The University of Michigan provides an extensive report on the state of engineering in the USA. The report focusing on engineering education and the role of engineering in the economy and society. Engineering for a Changing World – A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education. Recommended actions include:

  • Engineering professional and disciplinary societies, working with engineering leadership groups such as the National Academy of Engineering, ABET, the American Association of Engineering Societies, and the American Society for Engineering Education, should strive to create a guild-like culture in the engineering profession, similar to those characterizing other learned professions such as medicine and law that aim to shape rather than simply react to market pressures.
  • The federal government, in close collaboration with industry and higher education, should launch a large number of Discovery Innovation Institutes at American universities…
  • Undergraduate engineering should be reconfigured as an academic discipline, similar to other liberal arts disciplines in the sciences, arts, and humanities…
  • In a world characterized by rapidly accelerating technologies and increasing complexity, it is essential that the engineering profession adopt a structured approach to lifelong learning for practicing engineers similar to those in medicine and law…

Related: The Future is EngineeringScience, Engineering and the Future of the American EconomyMIT task force report on the Undergraduate Educational CommonsHarvard Elevates Engineering Profile - Imperial outlines vision for new era in engineering educationGeeks and Chiefs: Engineering Education at MITLeah Jamieson on the Future of Engineering EducationGlobal Engineering Excellence StudyEducating the Engineer of 2020


Search on this site:


Categories:

Links:

Tags:

appropriate technology ASEE career Civil Engineering Computer Science design Diversity Do-it-yourself economics Education Electrical Engineering energy engineering engineering education engineering projects engineers Engineers Without Boarders Environmental Engineering Envirotech fellowships funding Future green engineering How Things Work Innovation internet k-12 making a difference managing engineers materials engineering mechanical engineering NSF project management Research robots science science literacy Society technology The Economy The National Interest university webcast women workplace
  • Archives: