<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Engineering is #1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.asee.org/engineeringand/index.php/engineering-is-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.asee.org/engineeringand/engineering-is-1/</link>
	<description>Engineering snacks to whet your appetite</description>
	<pubDate>Mon,  8 Sep 2008 06:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Engineering Services</title>
		<link>http://blogs.asee.org/engineeringand/engineering-is-1/#comment-25404</link>
		<dc:creator>Engineering Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 07:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engineeringand.com/?p=39#comment-25404</guid>
		<description>I agree with Steve. You cannot lump engineering into one big category. Mechanical Engineering is quite different from civil engineering or telecommunications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Steve. You cannot lump engineering into one big category. Mechanical Engineering is quite different from civil engineering or telecommunications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.asee.org/engineeringand/engineering-is-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 06:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engineeringand.com/?p=39#comment-197</guid>
		<description>"Engineering" actually came up 17th.  I agree with the above commenter that these rankings are worthless, but for different reasons.  How can they group engineering into one big category, but include software engineering separately?  Stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Engineering&#8221; actually came up 17th.  I agree with the above commenter that these rankings are worthless, but for different reasons.  How can they group engineering into one big category, but include software engineering separately?  Stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
