Posts Tagged ‘The Economy’

“Rebuilding a Real Economy…” Forum Summary Published

“Americans feel prosperous based largely on the performance of three key economic indicators, said Ali Velshi, chief business correspondent for CNN. Are the values of their homes rising faster than inflation? Are their investments, whether for their children’s education or their own retirement, growing? And do their incomes equal or exceed increases in the cost of living?”

“Rebuilding a Real Economy: Unleashing Engineering Innovation: Summary of a Forum” has recently been published and is currently available online. This summary came from the 2009 Annual Meeting of the National Academy of Engineering, from a public forum with the same name, which highlights the main points brought about by seven leaders of the innovation system. These participants discussed why technological innovation is necessary for this nation to face the challenges of the 21st century.


Senator Kaufman: “Want to Rebuild the Economy? Ask an Engineer.”

Want to Rebuild the Economy? Ask an Engineer.
By U.S. Senator Edward E. Kaufman (who has a BS degree in mechanical engineering from Duke University)

America’s economy is in crisis. We can either drown under the weight of the problem, or we can surf the wave of opportunity that it brings – to put science, engineering and innovation back in their rightful place in our economy. If every cloud has a silver lining, the financial crisis may benefit America if we respond by taking steps to once again lead the world by innovating new industries, businesses and products.

As the only Senator holding an engineering degree, I remember when engineering ranked far ahead of business administration as the premier college degree for those who had ambition and the determination to succeed. After the Soviet Unions 1957 surprise launch of Sputnik 1, American leaders spurred the nation to catch up and improve our commitment to science. The Sputnik crisis led to the creation of NASA and other government research agencies, as well as an increase in U.S. government spending on scientific research and higher education. I was one of the young students who were drawn by Sputnik and our leaders call to seek an engineering degree.

More recently, an inordinately large percentage of Americas best and brightest college students opted instead to take their quant skills in math and analysis to Wall Street. During the go-go years on Wall Street, Americas engineering and innovation class declined. And it wasnt just that engineers were choosing finance over traditional engineering careers; fewer students were choosing to study engineering, period. Back in 1986, engineering and engineering technology students earned close to 10 percent of U.S. bachelors degrees. Despite attractive starting salaries, often above $50,000 a year, the percentage today is only about 5 percent. Only about 121,000 people earned degrees in engineering in 2007 and that includes bachelors, masters, and doctoral degrees.

Todays financial system meltdown gives our young people a new opportunity to take a hard look at where they want to spend their lives. And it gives Americas political and education leaders the opportunity to ensure that our educational pipeline is producing students skilled in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, about 80 percent of the new jobs created in the next 10 years will require these critical STEM skills. While America must remain a leader in finance, its clear we need a renewed dedication to leadership in engineering breakthroughs in energy, biotech, biomed and other many other technically based industries.

Here is what we should do right away:

Find more and better ways to marry public policy and engineering. Many universities have begun to do this, but we also must act on the government level. Beyond the current economic situation, our nation, and indeed the world, is facing a potential crisis in the supply and demand for clean energy and water. How these issues are resolved will define our childrens future. These problems require technical solutions, designed by scientists and engineers who also have a basic understanding of cultures, religions, and policy.

Develop programs that allow students to make a difference. Create an engineering jobs corps similar to the Peace Corps or Teach for America to help channel the young talent emerging from our engineering schools. The fields of bio-tech and bio-med, energy and environment should attract socially conscious students who want to improve the quality of life.

Prior to graduating, engineering students typically must write a final paper addressing a problem to solve. Lets publish those papers and make them available to government and to the business community, with authors rights kept secure.

Reach out to women and others who have traditionally been under-represented in engineering. The United States cannot maintain its position as a technological leader nor can we solve the problems we face without the perspectives and participation of all members of our society.

When I went to college I wanted to be an engineer, in part because 52 years ago the United States was supporting science and engineering on an unprecedented level. Americas competitive spirit helped us meet the challenges of those times. Thousands of innovations created myriad new opportunities for growth and development.

We can do this again. The financial crisis should cause a cultural shift back to the strong foundations of innovation and know-how that have always been the American way. And the federal government should again invest strongly in supporting the basic scientific, medical and engineering research that will spur the discovery and innovations to create millions of new jobs and shape a bright American future.

Related: Scientists and Engineers in Congress


Duderstadt Urges Revolution in Engineering Education

Speaker urges revolution in engineering education

“America faces the very real prospect of losing its engineering competence in an era in which technological innovation is the key to economic competitiveness, national security and social well-being,” said Duderstadt, who is president emeritus of the University of Michigan, where he is a professor of science and engineering.

In an address titled �Engineering for a Changing World,� Duderstadt pointed to warning signs of daunting challenges for engineering.

He cited the off-shoring of engineering jobs, inadequate investment in long-term engineering research, inadequate innovation in engineering education and declining interest among students in careers in science, technology, engineering and math.

Even more, it must expose engineering students to varied aspects of a well-rounded liberal arts education. More education in the humanities and social sciences is necessary to produce young engineers with a deeper comprehension of the cultural and historical forces within which scientific and technological advances have emerged.

Such an expanded educational horizon will provide students with the ability to see their engineering pursuits as part of a larger picture of the sociological, economic, political and environmental dynamics that are shaping the 21st century.

Giving students an understanding of the impact of science, engineering and technology on shaping the quality of life in the world will �infuse them with a new spirit of adventure� for engineering research and practice, he said.

Duderstadt said the nation�s universities must be committed to �creating a new breed of engineer that is better able to respond to the incredible pace of intellectual change� and to thrive in the modern global knowledge-based economy.

For the United States to maintain an edge in engineering innovation, it�s also critical to �elevate the status of the engineering profession,� he said. That will require engineers to take on more visible roles in influencing public policy through leadership in government and business.

Related: Engineering for a Changing WorldNSB Report on Improving Engineering EducationEngineering Education Study DebateChanging the Face of Engineering EducationInnovation Through Engineering EducationScience and Engineering in Global Economics


Engineering for a Changing World

James J. Duderstadt, President Emeritus and University Professor of Science and Engineering, The University of Michigan provides an extensive report on the state of engineering in the USA. The report focusing on engineering education and the role of engineering in the economy and society. Engineering for a Changing World – A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education. Recommended actions include:

  • Engineering professional and disciplinary societies, working with engineering leadership groups such as the National Academy of Engineering, ABET, the American Association of Engineering Societies, and the American Society for Engineering Education, should strive to create a guild-like culture in the engineering profession, similar to those characterizing other learned professions such as medicine and law that aim to shape rather than simply react to market pressures.
  • The federal government, in close collaboration with industry and higher education, should launch a large number of Discovery Innovation Institutes at American universities…
  • Undergraduate engineering should be reconfigured as an academic discipline, similar to other liberal arts disciplines in the sciences, arts, and humanities…
  • In a world characterized by rapidly accelerating technologies and increasing complexity, it is essential that the engineering profession adopt a structured approach to lifelong learning for practicing engineers similar to those in medicine and law…

Related: The Future is EngineeringScience, Engineering and the Future of the American EconomyMIT task force report on the Undergraduate Educational CommonsHarvard Elevates Engineering Profile - Imperial outlines vision for new era in engineering educationGeeks and Chiefs: Engineering Education at MITLeah Jamieson on the Future of Engineering EducationGlobal Engineering Excellence StudyEducating the Engineer of 2020


Increased R&D Budget Is A Mixed Blessing for Engineers

Engineers and scientists in many fields of research may have a new reason to worry. After a National Academies of Science report last year warned that America’s future security and economic strength were at risk for lack of funding of basic research in engineering and the physical sciences, President George W. Bush responded with the American Competitiveness Initiative (ACI), a plan to double funding over the next decade.

And his budget reflects that promise. However, most of the total amount earmarked for R&D is going to weapons development and development of a space vehicle to replace the Space Shuttle. Strip those dollars out�as an American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) analysis has done�and money available for basic and applied research totals $54.8 billion. That�s a slide of 3.3 percent and represents the third year in a row that research financing has taken a hit. Many research universities that specialize in areas outside aerospace and defense may be hard pressed to find funds to support many of their projects.

Read more about the state of the U.S. R&D budget in PRISM, ASEE‘s award-winning magazine.

Image courtesy of PRISM Magazine


Search on this site:


Categories:

Links:

Tags:

appropriate technology ASEE career Civil Engineering Computer Science design Diversity Do-it-yourself economics Education Electrical Engineering energy engineering engineering education engineering projects engineers Engineers Without Boarders Environmental Engineering Envirotech fellowships funding Future green engineering How Things Work Innovation internet k-12 making a difference managing engineers materials engineering mechanical engineering NSF project management Research robots science science literacy Society technology The Economy The National Interest university webcast women workplace
  • Archives: