Posts Tagged ‘The National Interest’

Science and Engineering Indicators 2010

The National Science Board’s Science and Engineering Indicators 2010 gives a comprehensive picture of the rise of developing nations in Asia, with China as the main engine, and gradual erosion of U.S. leadership. Examples:

  • North America’s share of world R&D activity between 1996 and 2007 dropped from 40% to 35% and the European Union’s share from 31% to 28%. The Asia-Pacific share increased from 24% to 31% “even with Japan’s comparatively low growth.”
  • American multinationals are shifting the R&D they conduct overseas from Europe to emerging Asian markets, whose share grew from 5% in 1995 to 14% in 2006.
  • China’s domestically earned natural science and engineering doctorates have shot up more than tenfold since the early 1990s, approaching the number awarded in the United States.
  • The share of U.S. engineering doctorates awarded to temporary and permanent visa holders rose from 51% in 1999 to 68% in 2007. Nearly three-fourths of these foreign Ph.D recipients were from East Asia or India.
  • From 1995 to 2008, the U.S. and E.U.’s combined share of world scholarly articles dropped from 69% to 59%, while Asia’s expanded from 14% to 23%. Over the past 20 years, the number of engineering research articles in the United States has grown by less than 2% annually. China’s engineering article output grew by close to 16% annually.
  • The share of patents granted to U.S.-based inventions by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is shrinking, from 55% in 1995 to 49% in 2008. In 1997, 34% of high-value patents had U.S. inventors; by 2006, this had slipped to 30%.
  • Related: NSB Report on Improving Engineering EducationCountry H-index Rank for Science PublicationsScience and Engineering Indicators – Workforce (2006)Worldwide Science and Engineering Doctoral Degree Data (2004 report)


    Senator Kaufman: “Want to Rebuild the Economy? Ask an Engineer.”

    Want to Rebuild the Economy? Ask an Engineer.
    By U.S. Senator Edward E. Kaufman (who has a BS degree in mechanical engineering from Duke University)

    America’s economy is in crisis. We can either drown under the weight of the problem, or we can surf the wave of opportunity that it brings – to put science, engineering and innovation back in their rightful place in our economy. If every cloud has a silver lining, the financial crisis may benefit America if we respond by taking steps to once again lead the world by innovating new industries, businesses and products.

    As the only Senator holding an engineering degree, I remember when engineering ranked far ahead of business administration as the premier college degree for those who had ambition and the determination to succeed. After the Soviet Union’s 1957 surprise launch of Sputnik 1, American leaders spurred the nation to catch up and improve our commitment to science. The Sputnik crisis led to the creation of NASA and other government research agencies, as well as an increase in U.S. government spending on scientific research and higher education. I was one of the young students who were drawn by “Sputnik” and our leaders’ call to seek an engineering degree.

    More recently, an inordinately large percentage of America’s best and brightest college students opted instead to take their “quant” skills in math and analysis to Wall Street. During the go-go years on Wall Street, America’s engineering and innovation class declined. And it wasn’t just that engineers were choosing finance over traditional engineering careers; fewer students were choosing to study engineering, period. Back in 1986, engineering and engineering technology students earned close to 10 percent of U.S. bachelor’s degrees. Despite attractive starting salaries, often above $50,000 a year, the percentage today is only about 5 percent. Only about 121,000 people earned degrees in engineering in 2007 – and that includes bachelors, masters, and doctoral degrees.

    Today’s financial system meltdown gives our young people a new opportunity to take a hard look at where they want to spend their lives. And it gives America’s political and education leaders the opportunity to ensure that our educational pipeline is producing students skilled in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, about 80 percent of the new jobs created in the next 10 years will require these critical “STEM” skills. While America must remain a leader in finance, it’s clear we need a renewed dedication to leadership in engineering breakthroughs in energy, biotech, biomed and other many other technically based industries.

    Here is what we should do right away:

    Find more and better ways to marry public policy and engineering. Many universities have begun to do this, but we also must act on the government level. Beyond the current economic situation, our nation, and indeed the world, is facing a potential crisis in the supply and demand for clean energy and water. How these issues are resolved will define our children’s future. These problems require technical solutions, designed by scientists and engineers who also have a basic understanding of cultures, religions, and policy.

    Develop programs that allow students to “make a difference.” Create an engineering jobs corps – similar to the Peace Corps or Teach for America – to help channel the young talent emerging from our engineering schools. The fields of bio-tech and bio-med, energy and environment should attract socially conscious students who want to improve the quality of life.

    Prior to graduating, engineering students typically must write a final paper addressing a problem to solve. Let’s publish those papers and make them available to government and to the business community, with authors’ rights kept secure.

    Reach out to women and others who have traditionally been under-represented in engineering. The United States cannot maintain its position as a technological leader nor can we solve the problems we face without the perspectives and participation of all members of our society.

    When I went to college I wanted to be an engineer, in part because 52 years ago the United States was supporting science and engineering on an unprecedented level. America’s competitive spirit helped us meet the challenges of those times. Thousands of innovations created myriad new opportunities for growth and development.

    We can do this again. The financial crisis should cause a cultural shift back to the strong foundations of innovation and know-how that have always been the American way. And the federal government should again invest strongly in supporting the basic scientific, medical and engineering research that will spur the discovery and innovations to create millions of new jobs and shape a bright American future.

    Related: Scientists and Engineers in Congress


    U.S. Competitiveness in Science and Technology

    According to an article this past January in the New York Times, entitled Global Advances Challenge U.S. Dominance in Science the United States is lagging behind the rest of the world in the development of new S&T talents. Thanks to globalization, Americans have become reliant on �foreign-born workers to fill technical jobs� with no end in site since efforts to fill student achievement gaps early on are not working. Many students and even adult Americans remain scientifically illiterate.

    However, a new report released by the RAND Corporation reads the same statistics somewhat differently, putting a positive spin on globalization. The report, U.S. Competitiveness in Science and Technology (pdf here) looked at factors such as, R&D spending, triadic patents, publications, investment in science and math education and the science and engineering workforce to determine if the US was really falling behind. What it found is that in almost every area the United States is leading the way, contributing to about 40% of R&D spending and triadic patents worldwide. Additionally, the report noted that while �U.S. investments per student in elementary and secondary education are on par with those of other industrialized nations� its investments in post-secondary education are nearly double that of other countries.

    As far as the S&E workforce is concerned, RAND was not too concerned, noting that growth in this area has been steady since 1980, largely due to foreign-born workers who �have helped enable� this trend.

    So globalization seems good. Increase in foreign-born workers in the United States should already indicate how the U.S. has benefited from integration into a world-wide society. RAND also speculates the US can profit from it economically as well if Americans can embrace foreign gadgets.

    The U.S. should not take S&E light- heartedly, but instead continue to try and counteract “exaggerated claims of the demise or success of U.S. science and technology”, RAND adds in a final statement. The article recommends three policy strategies that United States could adapt to continue going strong into the future, including, “establishing a centrally coordinated, independent body to monitor and evaluate U.S. performance in science and technology over the long term, facilitating high-skilled immigration to allow the United States to continue to benefit from employing foreign S&E workers and increase U.S. capacity to interact with science centers abroad and capitalize on the scientific and technological advances being made elsewhere.”


    Engineering for a Changing World

    James J. Duderstadt, President Emeritus and University Professor of Science and Engineering, The University of Michigan provides an extensive report on the state of engineering in the USA. The report focusing on engineering education and the role of engineering in the economy and society. Engineering for a Changing World – A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education. Recommended actions include:

    • Engineering professional and disciplinary societies, working with engineering leadership groups such as the National Academy of Engineering, ABET, the American Association of Engineering Societies, and the American Society for Engineering Education, should strive to create a guild-like culture in the engineering profession, similar to those characterizing other learned professions such as medicine and law that aim to shape rather than simply react to market pressures.
    • The federal government, in close collaboration with industry and higher education, should launch a large number of Discovery Innovation Institutes at American universities…
    • Undergraduate engineering should be reconfigured as an academic discipline, similar to other liberal arts disciplines in the sciences, arts, and humanities…
    • In a world characterized by rapidly accelerating technologies and increasing complexity, it is essential that the engineering profession adopt a structured approach to lifelong learning for practicing engineers similar to those in medicine and law…

    Related: The Future is EngineeringScience, Engineering and the Future of the American EconomyMIT task force report on the Undergraduate Educational CommonsHarvard Elevates Engineering Profile - Imperial outlines vision for new era in engineering educationGeeks and Chiefs: Engineering Education at MITLeah Jamieson on the Future of Engineering EducationGlobal Engineering Excellence StudyEducating the Engineer of 2020


    Increased R&D Budget Is A Mixed Blessing for Engineers

    Engineers and scientists in many fields of research may have a new reason to worry. After a National Academies of Science report last year warned that America’s future security and economic strength were at risk for lack of funding of basic research in engineering and the physical sciences, President George W. Bush responded with the American Competitiveness Initiative (ACI), a plan to double funding over the next decade.

    And his budget reflects that promise. However, most of the total amount earmarked for R&D is going to weapons development and development of a space vehicle to replace the Space Shuttle. Strip those dollars out�as an American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) analysis has done�and money available for basic and applied research totals $54.8 billion. That�s a slide of 3.3 percent and represents the third year in a row that research financing has taken a hit. Many research universities that specialize in areas outside aerospace and defense may be hard pressed to find funds to support many of their projects.

    Read more about the state of the U.S. R&D budget in PRISM, ASEE‘s award-winning magazine.

    Image courtesy of PRISM Magazine


    Nuclear Engineering At Home



    France plainly accused Iran today
    of pursuing a nuclear program that can only be intended for military purposes, just two days after Iran said it had resumed enrichment for civilian purposes. As global tensions soar over nuclear development, the United States needs to focus on its own nuclear program, ensuring that it is as safe and productive as possible. At home, from threats abroad, worries of global warming, to increased gas prices, recent trends are bringing nuclear power to the energy forefront. And on campus, students are flocking back to nuclear engineering programs.

    The public is gradually recognizing nuclear’s potential to mitigate global warming, and that shift has made an impact on students’ career choices. “Students are amazingly sensitive to the overall ethos and opinions of society,” says Ian Hutchinson, chair of the nuclear science and engineering department at MIT. “They’re the first to react.” He adds that the bursting of the Internet bubble in 2000 played a part as well. “Students realized that life is broader than computer science, and this was particularly important for people who had skills and interests in mathematically based sciences.” Read more about the latest trends in nuclear engineering in the U.S. in PRISM.


    Search on this site:


    Categories:

    Links:

    Tags:

    appropriate technology ASEE career Civil Engineering Computer Science design Diversity Do-it-yourself economics Education Electrical Engineering energy engineering engineering education engineering projects engineers Engineers Without Boarders Environmental Engineering Envirotech fellowships funding Future green engineering How Things Work Innovation internet k-12 making a difference managing engineers materials engineering mechanical engineering NSF project management Research robots science science literacy Society technology The Economy The National Interest university webcast women workplace
  • Archives: